Mr_Sophistication posted on August 2nd, 2018
I also support the idea of the themer going second. I think it would also make the supporter's role much more interesting / challenging.
Generally this is where I disagree. If the supporter is last, he/she basically just "supports the ride", connecting pipes from the track spine to the ground or other theme elements. By placing the supporter in the middle, he/she can determine where something must go. For instance, if the supporter contours an airtime hill with very short supports, they are basically forcing the themer to choose between terrain, an arch, or a building to fill in that negative space. This gives the supporter some creative freedom, as they have some say in how the ride is set up, but not all!
However, I think we will have to end up with track > theme > supports. The problem is that footer height seems to be determined on the terrain below it, not a global variable. So if the themer came in with terrain, it'd mess it all up. :(
Kryptos posted on August 2nd, 2018
The biggest issues I see with this contest is due to the nature of teams [...] getting people to commit to their role in 4-6 weeks
Yep, and unfortunately this is just part of the contest. This actually happened to my team a few years ago. I made a crazy Intamin/Mack layout (wish I still had a pic), and Ajax did some very neat supports, all set up nicely for the themer with some nice gaps for a couple structures. The themer thought it failed tunnel test (even though it didn't), and he didn't even ask judges for clarification - he just ghosted us. So that was a bummer, and unfortunately it's just what happens sometimes.
For those looking to judge, if you could, please comment or edit your post with your NLE username if you had one. I'm trying to pair up who's who so I have some idea of how credible you all are. :)